What Is It?

The Scale of the Challenge.

In 2008, one in 54 homeowners had received at least one foreclosure filing – over 3 million homes. Within the next few years, that number is expected to rise to one in 33.

The mortgage foreclosure crisis that has unfolded over the past several years has, for many, turned homeownership into more of a nightmare than a dream. Beginning in 2006, housing prices in the United States took a downward turn after a decade of seemingly unstoppable growth. A combination of bank deregulation, subprime loans, loose underwriting standards, declining home values, and rising job losses has led to the worst spike in mortgage foreclosures since the Great Depression.

While the foreclosure crisis has hurt both homeowners and renters – across the nation, certain places and certain groups of people have been disproportionately impacted. In 2007, almost half of African Americans who moved out of their homes did so through foreclosure rather than sale. Between 1998 and 2006, African American borrowers lost an estimated $92 billion of wealth and equity from subprime loans, while Latino borrowers lost an estimated $98 billion. This amounts to the greatest loss of wealth for people of color in modern U.S. history, reversing recent progress in homeownership.

Foreclosures have clustered in distressed and “on the edge” neighborhoods in older cities such as Cleveland and Philadelphia as well as in new communities in high-growth areas including Phoenix and Florida. In the highest cost housing markets in the nation such as the San Francisco Bay Area, foreclosures followed working families out to the far edges of regions where they “drove until they qualified” for mortgages on homes they could afford.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Subprime Loans.

Communities of color were disproportionately targeted for subprime loans. According to Federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, in 2007, 34 percent of subprime loans were issued to African Americans and 29 percent were issued to Latinos, compared to 11 percent that went to whites.

The foreclosure crisis has further devastated poorer neighborhoods with weak housing markets. In more affluent neighborhoods where home values are strong, foreclosed properties are quickly absorbed by the market. But in neighborhoods that are not typically homebuyers’ first choice, foreclosed properties are likely to remain vacant, barring some kind of intervention. Unoccupied, those homes become magnets for vandalism and crime, driving the neighborhood’s property values down. A study in Philadelphia found that the presence of just a single boarded up home on a block reduced the value of neighboring properties by $6,500 each; a national study by the Center for Responsible Lending calculated a reduction of $5,000.

In the face of this crisis, housing counseling and advocacy groups, local and state governments, public housing authorities, community development corporations, community land trusts, citizen advocates, and other community stakeholders are rallying to respond by reclaiming vacant, foreclosed properties and returning them to productive use:

  • In Providence, Rhode Island two local nonprofit housing developers and a statewide organization are partnering to acquire foreclosed properties in two of the city’s hardest-hit neighborhoods and place them in a community land trust to provide permanently affordable housing for lower-income residents. (See Case Study section).
  • In Cleveland, Neighborhood Progress, Inc. and the Cleveland Housing Network are collaborating on the Opportunity Homes strategy to stimulate market recovery in six Cleveland neighborhoods. The strategy is three-pronged: 1) rehabilitate vacant homes as energy-efficient homes; 2) demolish blighted homes that cannot be rehabilitated; and 3) partner with community groups such as Empowering and Strengthening Ohio’s People (ESOP) and others to prevent families from losing their homes to foreclosure in the first place. (See Case Study section).
  • In the Twin Cities, a statewide group, the Minnesota Foreclosure Partners Council, is coordinating efforts to gather data, create financing tools, implement recovery strategies, and enact policy changes to combat the foreclosure crisis. Minneapolis and St. Paul are also acquiring properties in targeted neighborhoods and participating in the National Community Stabilization Trust’s First Look program to preview and acquire foreclosed properties. (See Case Study section).

Front-End Strategies: Foreclosure Prevention

This tool focuses almost exclusively on what communities can do to steer neighborhoods on a course of sustainable recovery after foreclosure processes are well underway. Efforts to prevent foreclosure in the first place, and keep owners in their homes, though absolutely critical, are outside its scope. See this Fact Sheet from the Center for Responsible Lending outlining key prevention strategies.

This tool provides a framework for developing a comprehensive foreclosure recovery plan and showcases the most innovative and promising strategies for the acquisition, maintenance, management, and transfer of these properties to low-income renters and homeowners, or for other beneficial neighborhood use. Communities can use this information to develop effective foreclosure recovery plans and compete for the additional $2 billion in new funding available in the federal stimulus package’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP). Funding applications are due July 17, 2009.

Quick Guide to Tool Sections:

  • Getting Started presents 11 key action steps for developing a foreclosure recovery plan.
  • Menu of Strategies describes acquisition, disposition and stewardship strategies for foreclosed properties.
  • Choosing a Strategy prioritizes strategies based on neighborhood market strength.

The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP): A Major Funding Source for Foreclosure Recovery

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) of 2008 established the Neighborhood Stabilization Program to help communities reclaim foreclosed properties and reduce their negative impacts on neighborhoods. The $3.9 billion program subsequently received a $1.92 billion boost from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) of 2009. Local governments may use the NSP grants to finance the purchase of foreclosed and abandoned housing and to redevelop or re-sell these homes to help stem the decline in property values for the surrounding neighborhood. Its key requirements are:
  • Finance acquisition of bank-owned foreclosures for no more than 85 percent of the home’s appraised value.
  • Local governments are prohibited from making a profit on any sale.
  • HUD’s guidelines allow local governments to rent properties to income-eligible applicants, if they can’t find buyers.
  • An 18-month window for local governments to spend funding; but local agencies have up to five years to spend funds recaptured from a property’s resale.
  • Assisted homes must be maintained as affordable housing for “as long as practicable.”
The Enterprise Foundation has published a summary of the changes to NSP and a summary of the competitive application requirements for the second round of funding.